dozer wrote: ↑1 year ago
Felwin wrote: ↑1 year ago
dozer wrote: ↑1 year ago
Felwin wrote: ↑1 year ago
Hang on. Just read Collyer and Ugarte are doubtful.
Eriksen and Casemiro it is. May as well give Spurs 3 points now and not bother.
You didn't rate availability as an important trait in a player though so why is this an issue?
I remember debating with you about this - you rate an injury prone crock who's mediocre when fit over someone like Antony who's mostly available but crap. These players are just examples, we debated this point about availability when we were discussing Maguire when his stock was relatively low.
Can we rely on Mason Mount and Shaw tomorrow? Unlike Amad who is on much lesser wages, these players are, at best, average when fit.
???
Are you inventing arguments again to get a rise? Been a bad week or summat?
These were easy to find.
This was 5 months ago.
We talk about injuries in this page but this post stood out.
viewtopic.php?t=5&start=21930
Felwin wrote: ↑1 year ago
I think they’ve prioritised well. CB and DM were so much more important and they took the opportunity to give us another option up front.
Shaw’s availability is a problem but if everyone is fit, we have options at LB at least. Not like CB where we lost our best one and the others are shit apart from Martinez, or DM where we only have one and he can’t defend anymore. LB will do for another season. We can’t do everything in one window like a state run club and if we’d done a Chelsea, we’d all be shitting bricks about the club going down the pan properly.
Left back wasn't a problem position apparently with two full time crocks there. This was being discussed after our transfer window so this was under ten hag where he preferred playing actual left backs instead of right backs or wingers there. We only had 2 left backs.
What's funny was you expected Shaw to start 30+ games this season.
Then there is this page which discusses maguire and other players with respect to their fitness record, amongst other things. Interestingly I was asked to provide evidence in that thread as well, not by you though.
viewtopic.php?p=186803
I know it's well documented that you're a troll but this post makes you look idiotic to boot. I don't need to relitigate what I said as it's all there, but in summary; We were financially constrained, LB didn't seem a priority, at no point did I say Shaw would start 30+ games and at no point do I not rate availability.