Yeah. Bottom line is why should he take a paycut to join anyone else - even if it's just a million more. Unless he's specifically doing something illegal by accepting such pay, he has no risk.Felwin wrote: ↑1 month agoI agree, but the earnings at City involve (allegedly) assets and anonymous investments in shell companies in the UAE. 10m is fish food compared to the earnings when you start playing that game.Jason wrote: ↑1 month agoIf elliot Anderson, at 23, and likely earning 10m a year even if he signed for us, cant turn that into generational wealth, he needs to hire better financial advisors!Felwin wrote: ↑1 month agoAgree, we're all desperate for us to be sensible. But Ando looks excellent. There are shades of Robbo, Keano and Scholes to his game - he looks like a United midfielder should look.fat maradona wrote: ↑1 month agoYup, we're linked with new midfielders each week.
We are very strongly linked with making a move for Anderson but don't think we'd be able to afford what Forest will demand for him and he might also prefer City.
I'd rather we went for 2 decent midfielders over one blockbuster signing.
But times have changed and if he wants to set up his family for several generations with creative offshore accounting, then let him. Everyone has their priorities.
But I think this is only illegal from FFP perspective, which would apply only to the club. He's probably in the clear.
